Human wrongs
Click here and read me.
This has somewhat annoyed me, and I must say, I fully support the view of the Student Guild.
I'm all for equal opportunities, and in this case, to allow the maximum number of people access to their society, they should be allowing anyone through their doors, believer or not!
The Christian Society may argue that it is against their human rights to ban them from using their buildings, but what about their violation of the rights of those who wish to join to explore beliefs, or to experience other people's, but may not be a believer themselves?
The Archbishop of Canterbury says it looked like a "fear of an open argument". What sort of "open argument" only allows Christians? Doesn't sound very open to me...
Where's the sense gone?
R
This has somewhat annoyed me, and I must say, I fully support the view of the Student Guild.
I'm all for equal opportunities, and in this case, to allow the maximum number of people access to their society, they should be allowing anyone through their doors, believer or not!
The Christian Society may argue that it is against their human rights to ban them from using their buildings, but what about their violation of the rights of those who wish to join to explore beliefs, or to experience other people's, but may not be a believer themselves?
The Archbishop of Canterbury says it looked like a "fear of an open argument". What sort of "open argument" only allows Christians? Doesn't sound very open to me...
Where's the sense gone?
R
posted by R at 5:50 pm
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home